What’s wrong with our current approach to space?

Electron orbits are the most popular type of spacecraft and have been the subject of a lot of discussion over the past few years, with some folks arguing they’re a better approach to getting to space than other methods.

A team of researchers led by John Ewing, a theoretical physicist at the University of California, Berkeley, have now taken a different approach.

Ewing and his team have come up with a way to produce the most efficient orbit of a particle in a way that’s much more compact and easier to control.

Their proposed technique involves making two large magnets that are positioned on opposite ends of the orbit, with the magnet at the opposite end of the spacecraft.

The researchers say the two magnets would be arranged so that one is oriented in the plane of the electromagnetic field of the magnetic field, and the other is oriented slightly to the side.

This would be the way that particles would be seen by the spacecraft during its orbit.

Ewing and the others argue that, even though this technique is very compact, it would still be much more efficient than the current method, and they would be able to make the spacecraft much smaller and lighter.

Electron orbits have been a topic of intense interest in the last couple of years because of the energy efficiency of them, and scientists have been looking for ways to create a spacecraft that could be made much smaller.

In recent years, some other researchers have used the idea of creating a spacecraft with a small solar panel to demonstrate how they could be built and launched to much smaller orbits.

Scientists have also been interested in how a spacecraft might be constructed, and have tried many different methods to do this.

But the Ewing-led team’s new method, they say, would be a lot more compact than those previous methods.

The researchers envision a spacecraft being built by a company that has a very large amount of experience building spacecraft, and could then design and build the spacecraft for the company’s own purposes.

For the current system, they suggest, a company could use a 3D printer to create an orbiter that would be assembled into a single large cube, which would then be shipped out to a test facility to be tested in space.

When the spacecraft is in orbit, the scientists suggest, the spacecraft would have an antenna in the center of the cube that would transmit data to a computer.

The computer would then analyze the data and then send it back to Earth for analysis.

As the spacecraft’s mass is reduced, the researchers suggest, it could be used to power a small power plant.

Another way to make a spacecraft small is to design a spacecraft as a capsule, which is the opposite of a spacecraft, which involves making a smaller, lighter spacecraft that can be dropped into space and launched.

There’s also another way to design and make a small spacecraft that would have a larger engine, and that would involve using a laser to create energy and then sending the energy back to the Earth for use.

These techniques are just different ways of making smaller spacecraft, the team argues, and so it’s not clear that they have any particular benefit or drawback for small missions.

“The most important thing we’re trying to do is make it possible for people to get from point A to point B as quickly as possible,” said Ewing.

And he says that’s a key part of the problem: The technology has a lot going for it, but the way it’s used could have a big impact on the way missions go.

To make this work, the group needs to make sure the energy output is a lot smaller than what’s seen in existing spacecraft designs.

Once the team has made the necessary improvements, the research could be ready for a commercial launch.

Ewings and his colleagues say that could happen in about a decade.

Follow Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall and Google+.

Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook or Google+.

Originally published on Space.com.